How to use echocardiography to manage patients with shock? / ¿Cuál es la utilidad de la ecocardiografía en el shock?

Echocardiography enables the intensivist to assess the patient with circulatory failure. It allows the clinician to identify rapidly the type and the cause of shock in order to develop an effective management strategy. Important characteristics in the setting of shock are that it is non-invasive and can be rapidly applied. Early and repeated echocardiography is a valuable tool for the management of shock in the intensive care unit. Competency in basic critical care echocardiography is now regarded as a mandatory part of critical care training with clear guidelines available. The majority of pathologies found in shocked patients are readily identified using basic level 2D and M-mode echocardiography. The four core types of shock (cardiogenic, hypovolemic, obstructive, and septic) can readily be identified by echocardiography. Echocardiography can differentiate the different pathologies that may be the cause of each type of shock. More importantly, as a result of more complex and elderly patients, the shock may be multifactorial, such as a combination of cardiogenic and septic shock, which emphasises on the added value of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in such population of patients. In this review we aimed to provide to clinicians a bedside strategy of the use of TTE parameters to manage patients with shock. In the first part of this overview, we detailed the different TTE parameters and how to use them to identify the type of shock. And in the second part, we focused on the use of these parameters to evaluate the effect of treatments, in different types of shock. (AU)

La ecocardiografía permite al intensivista valorar al paciente con fallo circulatorio agudo. Esta técnica ayuda a identificar, rápidamente y de una manera no invasiva, el tipo y la causa del shock para instaurar una estrategia terapéutica. La realización de exámenes ecocardiográficos precoces y repetidos es una valiosa herramienta para el manejo del shock en la unidad de cuidados intensivos. La mayoría de patologías responsables del shock pueden ser identificadas con un nivel básico de ecocardiografía en 2D y modo M. En la actualidad, las competencias en ecocardiografía básica se consideran mandatorias en la formación de los profesionales de Medicina Intensiva. Los cuatro tipos básicos de shock (cardiogénico, hipovolémico, obstructivo y séptico) pueden ser adecuadamente identificados con la ecocardiografía. Además, la ecografía puede diferenciar las diferentes patologías que pueden ser la causa de cada uno de los tipos de shock. Es importante señalar que, dada la complejidad y la edad avanzada de muchos pacientes críticos, el shock puede ser multifactorial (p.ej.: combinación de shock séptico y cardiogénico), lo que enfatiza el valor añadido de la ecocardiografía transtorácica (ETT) en esta población de pacientes. En esta revisión, queremos proporcionar a los clínicos una estrategia, a pie de cama, del uso de los parámetros obtenidos con la ETT para manejo de los pacientes en shock. En la primera parte de este artículo, se detallan los diferentes parámetros ecocardiográficos y cómo pueden utilizarse para identificar los tipos de shock. En la segunda parte, se expone el uso de estos parámetros para evaluar el efecto de los tratamientos en los diferentes tipos de shock. (AU)

Treatment-Relevant Findings in Transesophageal Echocardiography After Stroke: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cardiac ultrasound to identify sources of cardioembolism is part of the diagnostic workup of acute ischemic stroke. Recommendations on whether transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) should be performed in addition to transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) are controversial. We aimed to determine the incremental diagnostic yield of TEE in addition to TTE in patients with acute ischemic stroke with undetermined cause. METHODS: In a prospective, observational, pragmatic multicenter cohort study, patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack with undetermined cause before cardiac ultrasound were studied by TTE and TEE. The primary outcome was the rate of treatment-relevant findings in TTE and TEE as defined by a panel of experts based on current evidence. Further outcomes included the rate of changes in the assessment of stroke cause after TEE. RESULTS: Between July 1, 2017, and June 30, 2019, we enrolled 494 patients, of whom 492 (99.6%) received TTE and 454 (91.9%) received TEE. Mean age was 64.7 years, and 204 (41.3%) were women. TEE showed a higher rate of treatment-relevant findings than TTE (86 [18.9%] versus 64 [14.1%], P<0.001). TEE in addition to TTE resulted in 29 (6.4%) additional patients with treatment-relevant findings. Among 191 patients ≤60 years additional treatment-relevant findings by TEE were observed in 27 (14.1%) patients. Classification of stroke cause changed after TEE in 52 of 453 patients (11.5%), resulting in a significant difference in the distribution of stroke cause before and after TEE (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with undetermined cause of stroke, TEE yielded a higher number of treatment-relevant findings than TTE. TEE appears especially useful in younger patients with stroke, with treatment-relevant findings in one out of seven patients ≤60 years. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03411642.

Scope of Practice of US Interventional Cardiologists from an Analysis of Medicare Billing Data.

The contemporary scope of practice of interventional cardiologists (ICs) in the United States and recent trends are unknown. Using Medicare claims from 2013 to 2017, we categorized ICs into 4 practice categories (only percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI], PCI with noninvasive imaging, PCI with specialized interventions [peripheral/structural], and all 3 services) and evaluated associations with region, hospital bed size and teaching status, gender, and graduation year. Of 6,083 ICs in 2017, 10.9% performed only PCI, 68.3% PCI with noninvasive imaging, 5.7% PCI with specialized interventions, and 15.1% all 3 services. A higher proportion of Northeast ICs (vs South ICs) were performing only PCI (24.8% vs 7.3%) and PCI with specialized interventions (12% vs 3.4%), but lower PCI and noninvasive imaging (53.8% vs 71.7%) and all 3 services (9.3% and 17.6%). Regarding ICs at larger hospitals (bed size >575 vs <218), a higher proportion was performing only PCI (23.8% vs 5.2%) or PCI with specialized interventions (13.5% vs 1.7%) and lower proportion was performing PCI with noninvasive imaging (48.8% vs 78%), similar to teaching hospitals. Female ICs (vs male ICs) more frequently performed only PCI (18.9% vs 10.6%) and less frequently all 3 services (8.3% vs 15.4%). A lower proportion of recent graduates (2001 to 2016) performed only PCI (9.8% vs 13.8%) and PCI with noninvasive imaging (66.3% vs 72.6%) but a higher proportion performed all 3 services (18% vs 8.4%) than earlier graduates (1959 to 1984). From 2013 to 2017, only PCI and PCI with noninvasive imaging decreased, whereas PCI and specialized interventions and all 3 services increased (all p <0.001). In conclusion, there is marked heterogeneity in practice responsibilities among ICs, which has implications for training and competency assessments.

The role of fetal echocardiogram after detection of extracardiac anomalies in utero (fetal echocardiogram for extracardiac malformations).

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the utility of comprehensive screening fetal echocardiography (FE) for patients diagnosed with any type of fetal extracardiac malformation (ECM) at a single multidisciplinary fetal center. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients presenting to our referral center for FE due to a prenatal diagnosis of ECM (January 2013-December 2018). RESULTS: Among 641 patients with ≥1 ECM referred for FE, 78 (12.2%) had CHD diagnosed at 25.6 ± 0.5 weeks. The frequency of CHD by type of ECM ranged from 35.1% for craniofacial to 9.8% for thoracic. Increasing number of fetal ECMs was strongly associated with CHD: odds ratio 2.01 (95% confidence interval: 1.06-3.69) for two ECMs, 9.57 (2.00-49.05) for three ECMs, and 11.68 (3.84-37.15) for more than three ECMs. Of fetuses with ECM and an abnormal genetic finding, 33.3% had CHD as compared to 10.9% of those without (p < 0.0001). Obstetric anatomy sonogram detected 43.6% of CHD. CONCLUSION: CHD was commonly diagnosed among fetuses with any type of ECM at our center but was not always detected on obstetric sonogram. As the presence of CHD may impact decision-making and perinatal care, patients with a diagnosis of any fetal ECM should be considered for FE.

Contrast echocardiography: current status and future directions.

Contrast echocardiography is a family of ultrasound-based procedures, whereby acoustic enhancing agents, usually microbubbles, are administered by intravenous route and detected in order to improve diagnostic performance. This review describes: (1) the agents that have been designed for diagnostic imaging, (2) current clinical applications where either left ventricular opacification or microvascular perfusion imaging with myocardial contrast echocardiography have been demonstrated to provide incremental information to non-contrast echocardiography and (3) future diagnostic and therapeutic applications of contrast ultrasound that rely on unique compositional design of ultrasound-enhancing agents.

Prominent Longitudinal Strain Reduction of Basal Left Ventricular Segments in Patients With Coronavirus Disease-19.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) has been associated with overt and subclinical myocardial dysfunction. We observed a recurring pattern of reduced basal left ventricular (LV) longitudinal strain on speckle-tracking echocardiography in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and subsequently aimed to identify characteristics of affected patients. We hypothesized that patients with COVID-19 with reduced basal LV strain would demonstrate elevated cardiac biomarkers. METHODS AND RESULT: Eighty-one consecutive patients with COVID-19 underwent speckle-tracking echocardiography. Those with poor quality speckle-tracking echocardiography (n = 2) or a known LV ejection fraction of <50% (n = 4) were excluded. Patients with an absolute value basal longitudinal strain of <13.9% (2 standard deviations below normal) were designated as cases (n = 39); those with a basal longitudinal strain of ≥13.9% were designated as controls (n = 36). Demographics and clinical variables were compared. Of 75 included patients (mean age 62 ± 14 years, 41% women), 52% had reduced basal strain. Cases had higher body mass index (median 34.1; interquartile range 26.5-37.9 kg/m2 vs median 26.9, interquartile range, 24.8-30.0 kg/m2, P = .009), and greater proportions of Black (74% vs 36%, P = .0009), hypertensive (79% vs 56%, P = .026), and diabetic patients (44% vs 19%, P = .025) compared with controls. Troponin and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels trended higher in cases, but were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced basal LV strain is common in patients with COVID-19. Patients with hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and Black race were more likely to have reduced basal strain. Further investigation into the significance of this strain pattern is warranted.

Echocardiogram Utilization Patterns and Association With Mortality Following Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

BACKGROUND: Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) can result in left ventricular dysfunction, which can lead to hypotension and secondary brain injuries. Although echocardiography is often used to examine cardiovascular function in multiple clinical settings, its use and association with outcomes following severe TBI are not known. To address this gap, we used the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) to describe utilization patterns of echocardiography and examine its association with mortality following severe TBI. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a large administrative trauma registry maintained by the NTDB from 2007 to 2014. Patients >18 years with isolated severe TBI, and without concurrent severe polytrauma, were included in the study. We examined echocardiogram utilization patterns (including overall utilization, factors associated with utilization, and variation in utilization) and the association of echocardiography utilization with hospital mortality, using multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: Among 47,808 patients, echocardiogram was utilized as part of clinical care in 2548 patients (5.3%). Clinical factors including vascular comorbidities and hemodynamic instability were associated with increased use of echocardiograms. Nearly half (46.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 40.3%-51.7%) of the variation in echocardiogram utilization was explained at the individual hospital level, above and beyond patient and injury factors. Exposure to an echocardiogram was associated with decreased odds of in-hospital mortality following severe TBI (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.69-0.87; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Echocardiogram utilization following severe TBI is relatively low, with wide variation in use at the hospital level. The association with decreased in-hospital mortality suggests that the information derived from echocardiography may be relevant to improving patient outcomes but will require confirmation in further prospective studies.

Impacto en el manejo diagnóstico/terapéutico de la ecocardiografía básica dirigida a objetivos concretos en una UCI de cirugía cardíaca / Impact of goal directed basic echocardiography on diagnostic and therapeutic management in an ICU of cardiac surgery

OBJETIVO: Pocos estudios han evaluado el impacto en el diagnóstico y tratamiento de la ecocardiografía transtorácica básica en los pacientes postoperados de cirugía cardíaca. El objetivo de nuestro estudio fue valorar el impacto de la ecocardiografía transtorácica básica en el manejo diagnóstico y terapéutico de estos pacientes. DISEÑO: Durante 18 meses se estudiaron prospectivamente todos los pacientes postoperados de cirugía cardíaca que ingresaron en el Servicio de Medicina Intensiva de un hospital universitario. Se realizó una valoración clínica a todos ellos para establecer un diagnóstico y un tratamiento inicial. Se realizó una ecocardiografía transtorácica básica para valoración diagnóstica, que se comparó con la valoración clínica. En caso de discrepancia, se valoró cambiar el tratamiento en función a la ecocardiografía y se evaluó la respuesta terapéutica. Se realizó un análisis descriptivo de los hallazgos. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 136 pacientes y se realizaron 203 ecocardiografías. La ecocardiografía transtorácica difería del diagnóstico inicial en 101 (49,8%) ecocardiografías. En 56 de estas (55,44%) se obtuvo un diagnóstico alternativo, lo que comportó un cambio en el tratamiento en 30pacientes (53,6%). Encontramos mejoría clínica significativa en 26 de estos pacientes (86,76%) en los siguientes 30-60min. CONCLUSIONES: La ecocardiografía transtorácica básica es útil en el manejo diagnóstico y terapéutico de los pacientes postoperados de cirugía cardíaca. En la mitad de las ecocardiografías realizadas no se pudo confirmar el diagnóstico clínico. En la mayoría de los pacientes en que observamos cambio en el diagnóstico debido a la ecocardiografía, se observó mejoría clínica tras el cambio de tratamiento

OBJECTIVE: Few studies have evaluated the impact in diagnosis and therapeutic management of basic transthoracic echocardiography in postoperated cardiac surgery. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of basic transthoracic echocardiography in the management of this kind of patients. DESIGN: Over an 18-month period, we prospectively studied all patients admitted to a university hospital Intensive Care Unit following heart surgery. We evaluated clinically all of them to establish a diagnosis and an initial treatment. We performed basic transthoracic echocardiography for a diagnosis evaluation that was compared with clinical diagnosis. If they differed, we assessed to change treatment and evaluate the therapeutic response. We performed a descriptive analysis. RESULTS: We included 136 patients and performed 203 echocardiographies. Transthoracic echocardiography differed of initial diagnosis in 101 (49.8%) echocardiographies. In 56 of these echocardiographies (55.44%), we could give an alternative diagnosis with a change in the treatment in 30patients (53,6%). We found clinical improvement in 26 patients (86.76%) in the following 30-60minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Basic transthoracic echocardiography is useful in diagnostic and therapeutic management of postoperative cardiac surgery patients. We could not confirm the clinical diagnosis in half of the performed echocardiographies. In most patients in whom we observe a change in the diagnosis due to echocardiography, we observed a clinical improvement after changing the treatment

Future developments in the MECKI score initiative.

The Metabolic Exercise combined with Cardiac and Kidney Indexes [MECKI) score is a validated prognostic score for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction which combines commonly available clinical and metabolic parameters with two cardiopulmonary exercise test derived prognostic measurements. It has been validated to predict prognosis and to aid clinical decision making and it has been shown to be superior in predicting mortality compared with other commonly used prognostic scores for heart failure. In the future it would be valuable to establish whether the score holds true also in other settings, and in particular in under-represented groups - the elderly, women, and people of different ethnic backgrounds - and in other heart failure syndromes. In future it may be extended to assess its value in the presence of a range of co-morbidities such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary hypertension and frailty and cachexia as well as in other conditions such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, amyloid, asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction and hypertension. It may also be a candidate end-point for adaptive trials designed to prove an improvement in the MECKI score as an approvable interim end-point whilst larger mortality and morbidity trials are still underway.

Comparison of myocardial performance index and right ventricular myocardial acceleration during isovolumic contraction in detection of right ventricular dysfunction in obese patients.

OBJECTIVE: Although obesity is a risk factor for heart failure, studies analyzing the effect of obesity on heart functions have primarily examined the left side of the heart. This study is an analysis of the effect of the severity of obesity on right heart functions and a comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of different echocardiographic modalities in the detection of right heart dysfunction. METHODS: A total of 116 subjects were included and divided into 4 age- and sex-matched groups according to body mass index (BMI) values. Right heart functions were evaluated with transthoracic echocardiography. RESULTS: The right atrium (RA) diameter was significantly larger in the obese group (OBG) and the morbidly obese group (MOG); the right ventricle (RV) diameter was significantly larger only in the MOG. In the overweight group, the OBG, and the MOG, the RV isovolumic acceleration (R-IVA) was significantly lower (p=0.020; p<0.001; p<0.001, respectively) and the myocardial performance index (MPI) value was significantly higher (p=0.015; p<0.001; p<0.001, respectively). There was a strong positive correlation between the MPI and the BMI (r=0.833, p<0.001), and a moderate negative correlation between the R-IVA and the BMI (r=-0.547, p<0.001). A cut-off value of 30.45 kg/m2 was associated with 93.3% sensitivity and 94.3% specificity in the prediction of RV systolic dysfunction defined by the MPI. A cut-off value of 30.50 kg/m2 was associated with 76.7% sensitivity and 72.3% specificity in the prediction of RV systolic dysfunction defined by the R-IVA. CONCLUSION: Obesity significantly affected right heart function and there was a significant correlation between the degree of obesity and right heart functional deterioration. The BMI could be used to predict RV systolic dysfunction.

Impact of Tricuspid Regurgitation on Clinical Outcomes: The COAPT Trial.

BACKGROUND: The presence of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) may affect prognosis in patients with mitral regurgitation (MR). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the impact of TR on outcomes in patients with heart failure and severe secondary MR randomized to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) or edge-to-edge repair with the MitraClip in the COAPT (Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients With Functional Mitral Regurgitation) trial. METHODS: A total of 614 patients with symptomatic heart failure with moderate to severe (3+) or severe (4+) secondary MR were randomized to maximally tolerated GDMT plus MitraClip or GDMT alone; 599 had core laboratory evaluable echocardiograms. Patients were divided into 2 groups by baseline TR severity: none/trace/mild TR (≤Mild TR) (n = 501 [83.6%]) and moderate/severe TR (≥Mod TR) (n = 98 [16.4%]). Two-year composite endpoints of death or heart failure hospitalization (HFH) and the individual endpoints were analyzed. RESULTS: Patients with ≥Mod TR were more likely to be New York Heart Association functional class III/IV (p < 0.0001) and have a Society of Thoracic Surgeons score of ≥8 (p < 0.0001), anemia (p = 0.02), chronic kidney disease (p = 0.003), and higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (p = 0.02) than those with ≤Mild TR. Patients with ≥Mod TR had more severe MR (p = 0.0005) despite smaller left ventricular volumes (p = 0.005) and higher right ventricular systolic pressure (p < 0.0001). At 2 years, the composite rate of death or HFH was higher in patients with ≥Mod TR compared with ≤Mild TR treated with GDMT alone (83.0% vs. 64.3%; hazard ratio: 1.74; 95% confidence interval: 1.24 to 2.45; p = 0.001) but not following MitraClip (48.2% vs. 44.0%; hazard ratio: 1.14; 95% confidence interval: 0.71 to 1.84; p = 0.59). Rates of death or HFH, as well as death and HFH alone, were reduced by MitraClip compared with GDMT, irrespective of baseline TR grade (pinteraction = 0.16, 0.29, and 0.21 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe secondary MR who also had ≥Mod TR had worse clinical and echocardiographic characteristics and worse clinical outcomes compared to those with ≤Mild TR. Within the COAPT trial, MitraClip improved outcomes in patients with and without ≥Mod TR severity compared with GDMT alone. (Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients With Functional Mitral Regurgitation [COAPT]; NCT01626079).

The Future of Cardiac Ultrasound in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Cardiac ultrasound is increasingly used to guide hemodynamic decision making in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). This article focuses on likely future progress in training, accreditation, digital connectivity, miniaturization, and modality development. Many documents have been published internationally to guide cardiac ultrasound training, accreditation, and implementation in the NICU, but challenges remain in providing assessments of hemodynamic status without risking missed structural diagnoses. Advances in simulation training and digital connectivity provide an opportunity to standardize approaches across institutions and continents. Development of machine learning and ultrasound modalities in turn provide huge scope for improving robustness and completeness of assessment.

Utilization of Cardiac Surveillance Tests in Survivors of Breast Cancer and Lymphoma After Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network and American Society of Clinical Oncology recommend consideration of the use of echocardiography 6 to 12 months after completion of anthracycline-based chemotherapy in at-risk populations. Assessment of BNP (B-type natriuretic peptide) has also been suggested by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Heart Failure Society of America for the identification of Stage A (at risk) heart failure patients. The real-world frequency of the use of these tests in patients after receipt of anthracycline therapy, however, has not been studied previously. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this retrospective study, using administrative claims data from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse, we identified 31 447 breast cancer and lymphoma patients (age ≥18 years) who were treated with an anthracycline in the United States between January 1, 2008 and January 31, 2018. Continuous medical and pharmacy coverage was required for at least 6 months before the initial anthracycline dose and 12 months after the final dose. Only 36.1% of patients had any type of cardiac surveillance (echocardiography, BNP, or cardiac imaging) in the year following completion of anthracycline therapy (29.7% echocardiography). Surveillance rate increased from 37.5% in 2008 to 42.7% in 2018 (25.6% in 2008 to 40.5% echocardiography in 2018). Lymphoma patients had a lower likelihood of any surveillance compared with patients with breast cancer (odds ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.74-0.85]; P<0.001). Patients with preexisting diagnoses of coronary artery disease and arrhythmia had the highest likelihood of cardiac surveillance (odds ratio, 1.54 [95% CI, 1.39-1.69] and odds ratio, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.3-1.53]; P<0.001 for both), although no single comorbidity was associated with a >50% rate of surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of survivors of breast cancer and lymphoma who have received anthracycline-based chemotherapy do not undergo cardiac surveillance after treatment, including those with a history of cardiovascular comorbidities, such as heart failure.

Adherence to guidelines in the management of patients with chronic heart failure follow-up: role of periodic echocardiographic examinations.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The Adherence to Guidelines in the Treatment of patients with Chronic Heart Failure trial showed a poor adherence to the current therapeutic guidelines in 660 chronic heart failure (CHF) patients. The second phase, Adherence to Guidelines in the Treatment of patients with Chronic Heart Failure follow-up, was aimed to determine if periodic echocardiographic evaluations could improve the prognosis of CHF patients and/or increase the adherence to the guidelines. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Among 528 CHF patients with reduced ejection fraction from the ALERT registry, 436 patients accepted to participate in the second phase of the study between February and September 2013 and completed the 3-year follow-up phase between February and September 2016. They were randomized into two groups: Group A (n = 218) followed by clinical evaluation and ECG every 3 months, and echocardiography every 6 months and Group B (n = 218) monitored only with clinical evaluation and ECG every 3 months. RESULTS: The number of vascular events that occurred resulted as similar in both the groups: there were 78 hospitalizations (37 in Group A vs. 41 in Group B); 9 home-treated vascular events (4 in Group A and five in Group B); and 16 cardiovascular deaths (9 and 7, respectively). The adherence to the guidelines at the end of the trial resulted as significantly improved in both the groups in comparison with the basal evaluation, without differences between the two groups. CONCLUSION: A strict follow-up of CHF patients was associated with a lower number of events and an improvement in the adherence to the guidelines. Periodic echocardiography does not modify these results.

Clinical impact of post procedural mitral regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: While the impact of mitral regurgitation (MR) prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been intensively studied, the implications of post-procedural MR on outcome are unknown. We investigated the clinical and physiological impact of significant MR after TAVR. METHODS: Clinical and echocardiographic data of 486 patients who underwent TAVR between March 2009 and December 2014 were evaluated. Clinical endpoints included overall mortality and combined endpoint of mortality, heart failure re-hospitalization and new atrial fibrillation. Echocardiographic parameters were analyzed at baseline, 30-day and 6-month after TAVR. RESULTS: MR severity improved in 25%, worsened in 19% and did not change in 56% of patients 30-days post TAVR (p = 0.3). Post TAVR MR grade ≥ moderate was present in 16.1%. Predictive accuracy of post TAVR MR was low (AUC = 0.63). Median follow-up was 4.3 years (interquartile range, 2.5 to 6.1). Post TAVR MR grade ≥ moderate was associated with increased mortality and combined cardiac events (p = 0.013 and p < 0.001) even when adjusted for all clinical and echo parameters and when analyzed with propensity score matching. In patients with MR ≥ moderate, LV filling pressure and RV hemodynamics worsened 6 months post TAVR, while improving in patients with less significant post procedural MR. CONCLUSION: Post procedural, but not pre-procedural MR grade ≥ moderate was independently associated with mortality and adverse cardiac events after TAVR. Significant MR post TAVR resulted in adverse LV and RV remodeling and poor hemodynamic. Our study strengthens the rational for initiating early treatment to reduce post TAVR MR.

Current and Emerging Imaging Techniques in Patients with Genetic Aortic Syndromes. / Aktuelle Bildgebungs-Strategien bei genetisch bedingten Erkrankungen der Aorta.

BACKGROUND: Patients with genetic aortic syndromes such as Marfan or Loeys-Dietz syndrome have a decreased life expectancy due to the risk of aortic dissection and rupture. Imaging plays an important role in the acute setting but also in the initial diagnosis and image-based monitoring. In this article, we provide an overview of the most common genetic aortic syndromes and recommended imaging strategies. Furthermore, we highlight modern imaging methods allowing for the quantification of hemodynamic changes in aortic disease. METHOD: This is a narrative review article on genetic aortic syndromes and recommended imaging strategies, where we take into account expert opinions and standard-of-care practices from our own center. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Radiological imaging plays a key role in the initial diagnosis and surveillance of patients with genetic aortic syndromes. Radiologists contribute significantly to the multi-disciplinary setting of genetic aortic syndromes with knowledge of special features and recommended imaging methods. Accurate measurement of the aorta is crucial, particularly in terms of diameter-based surgical treatment algorithms. Modern imaging methods like 4D-flow MRI and pulse wave velocity have a potential to further improve individualized risk stratification in patients with genetic aortic syndromes. KEY POINTS: · The risk for cardiovascular complications such as acute aortic syndrome is increased in patients with genetic aortic syndromes.. · Recommended time intervals between image-based monitoring depend on the underlying aortic disease.. · CT-angiography should be used only in the acute setting.. · Non-contrast MR-angiography is adequate for screening and image-based monitoring of patients with genetic aortic syndromes.. CITATION FORMAT: · Weinrich JM, Lenz A, Girdauskas E et al. Current and Emerging Imaging Techniques in Patients with Genetic Aortic Syndromes. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2020; 192: 50 - 58.